The language of things…
- May 8th, 2012
- Write comment
People could (and do) write volumes on language and terminology, and on how we use language to define ourselves. In my four months in the scene, I have thought about what words get used in places quite a bit.
One thing I’ve always found interesting about content of a sexual nature is the use of “naughty words” over plainer language. For instance, the rear end is usually referred to as “ass”, and not as “behind”, “backside”, or even “butt”. Likewise, I’ve noticed that the penis is usually referred to as “cock”. I’ve always found it interesting, mostly because I find such terms to be uncouth, even when used sexually. Maybe it’s just me. I wonder if others feel similarly about the use of “foul language” as the normal term. However, the use of foul language is more just a pet peeve of mine than anything else. I’m not fond of it, but whatever. If it makes people tick, then more power to them, I suppose.
The terms that I think about most are the terms “dominant”, “submissive”, “top”, and “bottom”. That thinking usually centers around how I identify myself in that concept set as I learn more about my own style and behaviors in scene settings. Going in back in January, I thought that dominant = top and top = dominant, and likewise I thought that submissive = bottom and bottom = submissive. In other words, I thought that the terms were exactly equivalent. Now I know that the terms are not necessarily the same.